Home

Birding

Conservation

Education

Mason Center

Lecture Series

Nature Shops

Shop Online

About Us

Become a Member

Business Members

Make a Donation

Volunteer

Visiting SE Arizona

Links to Other Sites

  


Other Information

  SE Arizona Rare 
  Bird Alert
  (520) 798-1005

  Report Rare Birds
  (520) 798-1005
  
Email a report

  Nature Shop
  (520) 629-0510

  Agua Caliente Shop
  (520) 760-7881

  Mason Audubon
  Center
  (520) 744-0004

  Membership
  (520) 629-0757

  AZ IBA Program
  (520) 628-1730

  Education Program
  (520) 622-2230

  Habitat Restoration
  (520) 206-9900

  Development
  
(520) 622-5622

  Executive Director
  (520) 622-5622

Conservation home  | IBA Program  | Habitat restoration  |  Public lands  |  Border program

 
Tucson Audubon's Letter's Opposing 
TEP Proposed Powerline
Tucson Audubon Society


See also an article from Tucson Audubon's October 2003 newsletter on why we opposed the currently preferred powerline route.

Letter to the Department of Energy

8 October 2003

Dr. Jerry Pell
Office of Fossil Energy
U. S. Department of Energy
Washington, D. C. 20585

Dear Dr. Pell:

Tucson Audubon Society (TAS) does not support the preferred alternative for locating the "Tucson Electric Power Sahuarita-Nogales Transmission Line," and is concerned about the focus of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the line. None of the alternatives for locating the line is satisfactory, but the preferred alternative (i.e., the Western Route) is the worst, from the biological perspective of TAS. It is the longest and most expensive alternative, and likely will have the most negative impacts on an area prized for its primitive recreational opportunities and natural beauty. For example, the preferred alternative would require construction of at least 20 miles of new roads. Furthermore, according to analyses presented in the DEIS, placing the line along the preferred route has the most potential to do harm to sensitive plant and animal populations (i.e., 74 species; Tables S-1).

The most disturbing aspect of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement, however, is that alternatives to a 345 kv line were not considered. Can the needs of Santa Cruz County be met with a smaller, less obtrusive line (e.g., 115 kv line), or a locally run power plant? We request that a Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement be written that analyzes alternative solutions to providing power to Santa Cruz County.

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this important issue.

Sincerely,

Sonja Macys
Executive Director, Tucson Audubon Society

Letter to the Coronado National Forest

9 October 2003

Sue Kozacek
Acting Forest Supervisor
Coronado National Forest
300 W. Congress
Tucson, AZ 85701

Dear Ms. Kozacek:

Tucson Audubon Society (TAS) does not support the preferred alternative for locating the "Tucson Electric Power Sahuarita-Nogales Transmission Line." None of the proposed routes for the line is satisfactory, but the preferred alternative (i.e., the Western Route) is the worst, from the biological perspective of TAS. It is the longest and most expensive alternative, and likely will have the most negative impacts on an area prized for its primitive recreational opportunities and natural beauty. For example, the preferred alternative would require construction of at least 20 miles of new roads. Furthermore, according to analyses presented in the DEIS, placing the line along the preferred route has the most potential to do harm to sensitive plant and animal populations (i.e., 74 species; Tables S-1).

For these reasons, TAS requests that you deny the special use permit for the preferred alternative for locating the "Tucson Electric Power Sahuarita-Nogales Transmission Line."

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this important issue.

Sincerely,

Sonja Macys
Executive Director, Tucson Audubon Society

 


Bird questions? Check Birding | General questions? Contact: Tucson Audubon Society | Webmaster: Email

This page was updated on 06/26/06